|
Mona Lisa restored in the Prado, Spain
Mona Lisa Digitally Restored in the Prado, Spain
mona-lisa-hidden-drawing
|
Cottee restored mathematically nova season 46 e 21 Decoding da vinci watch for free https://www.pbs.org/video/decoding-da-vinci-93ssvo/
cotte work https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/oct/22/artnews.france https://www.inverse.com/article/37607-da-vinci-mona-lisa-scan cottes 3 min restoration on facebook https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1504611460782522 https://allthatsinteresting.com/mona-lisa-hidden-drawing
Both paintings were done at the same time since they have the same corrections, but with different viewpints. The head is larger on the Prado because it was painted closer. (See Did LDV paint the ML in 3D?) Both paintings have the same dimensions Louvre (30 in × 21 in) and Prado (30.0 in × 22 in). The figure in the Louvre painting is a slighly smaller image. The paintings were painted side by with the Prodo painted closer to the model . But, when both paintins are overlaid you get a 3D image. This is more proof that Leonardo made copies of his own work. The The Prado painting is in better shape than the Louvre's. The Prado was restored in 2012. Before the Prado was restored the background was black. Restoring the Prado revealed it's background to be the same as in the Louvre's. Also before the Prado painting was restored the background was totally black. When it was re4stored the Mona Lisa background poped out. Before the Prado painting was restored the background was totally black. When it was re4stored the Mona Lisa background poped out. The new painting was very similar to the Louvre's. ================================ COTTE
The Louvre's painting hads never been restored. The green background colors in the Louvre's painting will turn blue when the varnish is removed and the colors restored. . Using Multi-scans and chemical signature of the paints Mr Cotte has restored the true colors to the Louvre's painting digitally in 2015. Cotte's restoration was done using a chemical anaylysis of paints and using his 13 scan digital camera LAM system.
https:/
Cotte:Giving the "Mona Lisa" a Digital Makeover
Nova pbs...Season 46 Episode 21
The Louvre ML labeled "No cracks" was restored
was done by a human
using a
photo editor.
The restoration also took out all the
cracks and micro that were in the painting.
The original ML has tons of cracks in every
square inch of the painting.
IMHO, this
cleared up Ms Lisa's flesh tones. The cracks makes her
look like she had a bad suntan.
What colors a computer or camera
sees are very different from what a human sees. For example,
a human can do a better job at depicting the red color
in your dress than a photograph ever could.
The painting is also badly
faded and the paint has dried out and aged.
This may be because
Leonardo had
severe arthris
in his later years and
probably cranked up the heat in his fireplace which
didn't do any good to the
paintings in his room.
Watch the "The true colours of the Mona Lisa" video
here
IMHO, The human restored image gives a better 3D iumage that the
Cottee computer analysis. This is because the human restoration
looks more like the Prado.
A computer or a photograph can not match up the colors accurately.
The blue on your dress is different from what a artist and a
machines "see". The artist, IMHO, is more accurate. Also whatever
the camera's "focus point" is ok, But, the rest of the photo is
distored. Foregrounds, are notorosuly
distorted in photos.
|
|
Note the detail work on the bodice of restored Prado Mona Lisa That's what the Louvre's Mona Lisa's bodice once looked like. and will if the Louvre ever restores it's Lisa.
|